Diligio vs Arphie
Two modern, AI-native tools, compared on verification, pricing, and data residency.
Arphie and Diligio are the two newest, most AI-native tools here, and we agree on a lot: ground every answer in your own sources, show where each one came from, and never train on your data. So the comparison really comes down to two differences. Arphie checks an answer with the same model that wrote it, while Diligio uses a separate model from another provider. And Arphie quotes per project, while our price is published and flat.
At a glance
Competitor details are publicly reported as of June 2026. Neither vendor publishes an official rate card, so pricing is hedged and dated.
Where Arphie is strong
- A clean, modern, AI-native experience that answers many questions quickly.
- Shows the exact sources and a confidence level for each AI draft.
- Does not use customer data to train models.
- Connects to knowledge sources such as SharePoint, Google Drive, and Confluence.
Where Diligio is different
Cross-provider verification, not self-citation
Arphie shows sources and a confidence score from the model that wrote the answer. Diligio adds a genuinely independent step: a second model from a different provider verifies each claim against your sources, so the check does not come from the same system that produced the draft. Weakly-supported answers are withheld rather than shown with a low score.
A flat, published price
Arphie uses project-based custom pricing with no public rate card. Diligio publishes one flat $7,499/year licence, which makes budgeting and comparison straightforward and removes the need for a quote to find out what you will pay.
EU data residency, stated explicitly
Diligio stores customer data at rest in the EU (AWS Paris) and publishes its sub-processors and security posture. Arphie does not publicly specify a default data-residency region, which can matter for European procurement and diligence.
Bring your own agent, bound by your roles
Diligio includes a scoped, audited interface your own AI agent can drive over MCP or REST, on your models and tokens, that can never exceed the permissions of the person who created the token. It is included in the flat price.
Who should choose which
Choose Arphie if
you like a modern AI-native tool with single-model drafting that shows sources and confidence, and project-based pricing fits how you buy.
Choose Diligio if
you would rather a second, independent model checked the answer, and you want the price and the EU data residency in writing.
Frequently asked questions
Is Diligio a good Arphie alternative?
Yes. The two are philosophically similar (both AI-native, both ground answers in your sources, and neither trains on your data). Diligio differentiates on cross-provider verification by a second independent model, a flat published $7,499/year price, and EU data residency by default.
How is Diligio's verification different from Arphie's confidence scores?
Arphie shows sources and a confidence level from the model that produced the answer. Diligio uses a second, independent model from a different provider to verify each claim against your sources, so the check is not produced by the same system as the draft, and weak answers are withheld rather than displayed with a low score.
How much does Arphie cost?
Arphie does not publish pricing; it uses a project-based custom-quote model. Diligio is a flat $7,499 per year, with AI, SSO, and agent/API access all included.
See it on your own documents
Upload a real questionnaire and watch Diligio draft answers grounded in your knowledge base, then independently verify each one before you review it.