Comparison · the open-source GRC veteran

Diligio vs Eramba (open-source GRC)

The self-hostable open-source workhorse, compared with an agent-assisted SaaS built on your questionnaire knowledge base.

Eramba is the veteran open-source GRC platform: a real, usable Community edition at $0, a low-cost Enterprise edition, and full self-hosting for teams with strict sovereignty needs. It covers the classic GRC surface, risk, policies, incidents, awareness and exceptions, with the trade-off that you operate it and drive it manually. Diligio Compliance is the opposite shape: a managed SaaS where an AI agent proposes evidence and statuses, a human certifies, and the programme shares one knowledge base with your security questionnaires. If self-hosting or a $0 budget is the requirement, Eramba is the honest pick.

At a glance

Competitor details are publicly reported as of June 2026. Neither vendor publishes an official rate card, so pricing is hedged and dated.

Dimension
Eramba
Diligio Compliance
Published pricing
Community free; Enterprise reported ~€2,500 to €5,000/yr
$1,999 flat / year
Framework breadth
Template library (ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI +); largely bring-your-own
18 live frameworks, cross-mapped (ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA +)
Automation model
Manual workflows; reminders and reviews
Agent proposes evidence + statuses; a human certifies
Hosting
Self-hosted (Community/Enterprise) or vendor SaaS
Managed SaaS
Knowledge base
No questionnaire-answering tie-in
Shares the knowledge base with your questionnaires
Data residency
Wherever you host it (self-hosted)
EU (AWS, Paris) + Supabase EU
Maturity
Long-established, active community
Newer, agent-native platform

Where Eramba is strong

  • A genuinely free, usable Community edition, not a crippled trial, maintained by an active open-source community.
  • Full self-hosting: for strict data-sovereignty or air-gapped requirements, running it yourself is the whole point.
  • Mature coverage of the classic GRC surface: risk registers, policy management, incidents, awareness campaigns, and exception workflows.
  • A flat, low fee for the Enterprise edition with no per-seat pricing.

Where Diligio Compliance is different

Agent-assisted versus hand-driven

Eramba gives you the structure, and your team does the work: controls, evidence, and reviews are maintained by hand. In Diligio Compliance, an AI agent you control proposes evidence and control statuses across a framework over MCP or REST, and a human certifies before anything is attested. The difference compounds with every review cycle.

Managed SaaS versus running your own GRC server

Self-hosting Eramba means owning upgrades, backups, and uptime for one more internal system. Diligio Compliance is a managed product on EU infrastructure. If your policy requires self-hosting, Eramba wins that requirement outright; Diligio Compliance is SaaS only today.

One knowledge base for questionnaires and compliance

Eramba does not answer your security questionnaires. Diligio Compliance shares one knowledge base with Diligio Respond, so the same approved answers drive your posture, your Trust Center, and your questionnaire responses.

Where Eramba is still ahead, honestly

On price at the bottom end (free is free), on self-hosting, and on years of hardening in classic GRC workflows. If those are your constraints, use Eramba. Diligio Compliance is the better fit when you want automation, an agent with a human-certify gate, and a maintained product without the ops burden.

Who should choose which

Choose Eramba if

you must self-host for sovereignty reasons, your budget is zero, or you have the in-house time to run a hand-driven GRC programme on a proven open-source platform.

Choose Diligio Compliance if

you want an audit-ready posture kept current with agent-assisted evidence and a human-certify gate, on a managed EU SaaS, sharing one knowledge base with your questionnaire answering.

Frequently asked questions

Is Diligio Compliance a good Eramba alternative?

They solve the same problem with opposite shapes. Eramba is self-hostable, hand-driven, and can be free; Diligio Compliance is a managed SaaS where an AI agent proposes evidence and a human certifies, at a flat $1,999 per year. Teams that outgrow manual GRC upkeep are the typical switchers.

How much does Eramba cost?

The Community edition is free and self-hosted. The Enterprise edition was reported at roughly €2,500 to €5,000 per year as of 2026 depending on hosting. Diligio Compliance is a flat $1,999 per company per year, managed.

Can Diligio Compliance be self-hosted like Eramba?

No. Diligio Compliance is a managed SaaS on EU infrastructure (AWS Paris plus Supabase EU). If self-hosting is a hard requirement, Eramba is the honest recommendation today.

Get started

Tell us which framework you are working towards and we will enable Diligio Compliance for your team and help you get set up.

Compare Diligio Compliance with others